August 20, 2009

Innovation in action

I’m going to pause my regular programming to tell you about Keith Blount. You may not know Keith, and—guess what?—neither do I.

But I love what he’s done.

Keith has created a software application called Scrivener, which is, sort of, an amalgam of a word processor and a project management tool.

Why is that important?

Because I used Microsoft Word to write The Net Present Value of Life and, as I was writing it, a few things came to mind.

The first was, no one writes a novel chronologically. At least I didn’t. No, the  fact is I jumped around a lot, writing a chapter that gave me an idea for another chapter. I’d then create a draft, based on that idea, that I’d later squeeze in somewhere between the book’s beginning and end.

Did I mention revisions?

I often made changes in one part of the manuscript (keeping a backup of the original file, in case I changed my mind), only to find, soon after, that my changes impacted on a later chapter that I had written much earlier.

Confused? Well, so was I, all because it really wasn’t an efficient way to work. Even worse, it was a process rife with minefields—I was always afraid, as I searched and edited blocks of text, that I’d delete, unnoticed, some crucial dialog, some character development, or something else entirely.

Which is why I kept backups. Lots and lots of backups.

The other thing I noticed? I was accumulating a big pile of supporting files containing research, weblinks, story-development ideas, statistical information, outlines, notions, mindless ramblings, and the occasional grocery list.

I kept backups of all that too.

It was, at times, hard to manage. And, as I look back, I’m puzzled that I never wondered whether there was a better way.

Which is why I’m thrilled to have, only recently, discovered exactly that—a better way. Scrivener truly is a one-stop, no-fuss-no-muss software application devoted to one simple task—writing.

Not only am I over the moon about Scrivener, but I’m equally impressed by Literature & Latte, the company that publishes it.

First off, let’s face it, Literature & Latte is an intriguing name for a software company. Turns out that Keith chose that name because he always wanted a bookshop/cafe. Hey! I love coffee. And I love books too. You see? A connection…

But that’s not the real reason I’m intrigued by the company.

What intrigues me (and what I identify with) is their history, and their philosophy.

The company’s history is right there, on their website. As it happens, Keith was (is) a writer who (like me) wasn’t thrilled with the available crop of word processors. Unlike me, though, he did something about it. He created Scrivener.

Now that’s what I call innovation in action.

As regards philosophy, they programmed Scrivener to work on Macs. Not Windows, just Macs. Why? Because the folk that work at Literature & Latte (both of them) prefer Macs. That’s it. No other reason. They like Macs.

Now how refreshing is that? A company creating something because that’s what they felt like creating? And not because some business metric like ROI (return on investment) or market capitalization suggested they do it. And certainly not because some focus group, or strategic-planning consultant, or leading-edge indicator implied that’s what they should be doing.

Then there’s the price point, which is much too reasonable—a steal in fact. Why is Scrivener priced so low? Because, as stated on their website, they “didn’t want to price out struggling writers.”

C’mon, how can you not be a fan of such a company?

There you have it. Scrivener. I’m a fan and I bet you will be too. So go ahead and try it. Right now.

But remember, you’ll need a Mac. Now how great is that?

Share
July 29, 2009

Of writing and iPhones

Remember the King Crimson song, I Talk to the Wind? The line that says I’ve been here and I’ve been there and I’ve been in between?

Well, that’s been pretty much me for the last ten days or so.

Typically, July is a quiet month for me. Not this year though. While trying to squeeze in a few days taking in some theatre and a comedy festival, I’ve been in steady contact with Jane (my new editor) and Alison (my new publicist and coordinator of all things bookish).

There are times, I’ll admit, that coupled with other projects on the go (more on that later) it all seems a little overwhelming. And, late last night, I figured out why.

Have you ever been in a car driven way too fast? I have. While the expert driver I was riding with knew what he was doing, it was, to me a mind-numbing experience—complete sensory overload, in fact, with everything moving too fast to comprehend.

After General Store told me, just last week, they liked my book, it triggered, I believe, that same reaction of sensory overload.  Why? Because I had given up on finding a publisher, that’s why.  And I had already mapped out my own self-imposed, self-directed, self-publishing strategy.

What I’m really saying, I guess, is the pace of my self-directed strategy was somewhere between lethargic and glacial.

Now, thanks to Jane (who continues to surprise me not only with her efficient speed, but also the quality of her editing), we’ve already got 20% of the book edited. And, thanks to Alison, we’re planning media-outlet promotions and a whole bunch of other stuff.

Which reminds me, by the way, if you or your spouse, parent, sibling, best-friend, happens to do something, with books, at the Globe and Mail, New York Times, Amazon, Publisher’s Weekly or any other similar organization, can you, you know, put in a good word?

Oh yes, I nearly forgot.

While the above was happening, I also got word that something I wrote, maybe two months ago, is getting published in Sports Car Market magazine. It’s a piece on old American cars in Cuba and it should be out next week.

What’s funny is, while I was visiting Niagara, the magazine sent me an email requesting—right now—a brief bio and a head shot. Because I had no computer with me, I searched my smartphone’s memory and sent them the only available photo. “Won’t do,” they said, “too far away.”

So my wife and I spent twenty minutes in a park, with my chintzy cameraphone and its meager 2 meg resolution, trying to capture an acceptable promo shot.

Which brings to mind….

Maybe now I can rationalize the desire for an iPhone. Hmmm, it might be tax-deductible too…

Share
June 21, 2009

The muck and mire of decisions

It’s getting close. The decision on editing and printing, it’s getting close. And here I am, like a driver on a grimy road, oh so close to getting bogged down in the mud and the mess.

It’s not that there aren’t enough choices, it’s that there are too many. Do I use an editor and printer who are local? Should I go with PODs like Lulu, iUniverse or Createspace? Lulu wants six bucks per copy and Createspace four-fifty. But Lulu offers editing and design while Createspace doesn’t. Can you picture the mud and muck slowly starting to rise?

And why? All because of what I’ll call ‘the optimal decision’. Whenever it’s decision time, I find myself lost in the details–running Excel spreadsheets and over-analyzing every last factor and scenario.

And that’s when I remind myself that it’s not really about the decision, but rather the psychology of the decision. You see? It’s not about making the right choice, it’s about being satisfied about the choice I made.  Let me put it another way; once I filter out the obvious egregious examples, they’re all right choices. Ever bought a car while your like-minded neighbor bought the model you eschewed? You’re pretty sure you made the right choice. And your neighbor? Hell she’s pretty sure she made the right choice too. It’s about the psychology and not the choice. And that especially holds true whether you perceive yourself as someone who usually makes the right choice (which I do) or someone who inevitably makes the wrong one (which I don’t). It’s the psychology, that’s all.

So here’s maybe what I’ll do. Go next door. Ask my neighbor.

Share
June 17, 2009

Where things stand

Thank you, everyone, for your comments and your ongoing interest in The Net Present Value of Life.

I thought now might be a good time to fill you in on where things stand on the publishing front. I’ve  written, re-written (countless times) and self-edited the book. All that’s needed, really, are two song permissions  (see a prior post about this) and professional editing. I expect the lyrics approval by late June, and I hope to have editing completed by late July or early August.

Once that’s done, my plan is to release the book via podcast, and to quickly follow that up with a free eBook. A printed version will come last in that chain of events. When will it be ready? I believe September is a realistic target.

In the meantime, I’ll continue updating events via this blog and twitter, and I’ll also provide some insight into the philospophy, rationale (and whatever other stuff I think of) that prompted my to write the book.

Thanks again and talk to you soon.

Share